Ken Paxton Secures $1.4 Billion Settlement with Meta Over Biometric Data Violations

Ken Paxton Secures $1.4 Billion Settlement with Meta Over Biometric Data Violations
Photo by Greg Bulla / Unsplash

Overview:
In a landmark legal case, Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton achieved a historic $1.4 billion settlement with Meta (formerly Facebook) over unauthorized biometric data capture. This marks the largest settlement obtained by a single state action and signifies a major victory for privacy rights.

Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI) protect Texans’ privacy
In-Depth Look at the Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI) Introduction The Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI), enacted in Texas in 2009, is a crucial piece of legislation aimed at protecting the privacy of individuals’ biometric data. As one of the few biometric privacy laws

Background:
The case stems from Meta's practice of capturing biometric data from users without their consent. This includes the use of facial recognition technology in features like "Tag Suggestions," which identified individuals in photos. These practices were deemed to violate Texas's Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier Act (CUBI) and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.

Meta automatically enabled this feature for all Texans without adequately explaining how it worked. For over a decade, the company ran facial recognition software on virtually every face in photographs uploaded to Facebook, capturing records of facial geometry without users' knowledge or consent.

Meta automatically enabled this feature for all Texans without adequately explaining how it worked. For over a decade, the company ran facial recognition software on virtually every face in photographs uploaded to Facebook, capturing records of facial geometry without users' knowledge or consent.

Facebook’s 2012 Controversy: Ethical Dilemmas in Psychological Experimentation
Introduction In 2012, Facebook found itself embroiled in a contentious lawsuit over conducting psychological experiments on its users. The social media giant faced significant backlash and legal challenges for its study aimed at mood manipulation, raising serious ethical questions about the boundaries of user consent and privacy in the digital

Details of the Settlement:

  • Amount: Meta will pay $1.4 billion over five years.
  • Legal Basis: The lawsuit highlighted Meta's collection of biometric data without informing users, violating state laws that require explicit consent.
  • Significance: This settlement surpasses the previous $390 million settlement with Google in 2022, underscoring the seriousness of biometric data privacy violations.

Statements:
Attorney General Paxton emphasized the state's commitment to holding major tech companies accountable for privacy breaches. He noted that this settlement serves as a warning to other companies that misuse personal data.

Attorney General Paxton emphasized the significance of this settlement, stating, "This historic settlement demonstrates our commitment to standing up to the world's biggest technology companies and holding them accountable for breaking the law and violating Texans' privacy rights". He further warned that any abuse of Texans' sensitive data would be met with the full force of the law.

New Mexico’s Legal Battle Against Meta: A Stand Against Child Exploitation on Facebook and Instagram
Introduction In a significant legal action, the state of New Mexico has initiated a lawsuit against Meta Platforms, Inc., the parent company of Facebook and Instagram. The case focuses on the critical issue of child exploitation on these widely used social media platforms. This article delves into the nuances of

Legal Proceedings:
The lawsuit, initiated in February 2022, charged Meta with unlawfully capturing biometric data. The aggressive litigation strategy led to this significant settlement, with contributions from legal teams at Keller Postman and McKool Smith.

This case marks the first lawsuit brought and first settlement obtained under Texas's CUBI Act, serving as a warning to other companies engaged in practices that violate privacy rights. It also highlights the growing concern over the use of biometric data and the need for stricter regulations and enforcement in this area.

Impact:
This settlement sets a precedent for other states and advocates for stronger privacy protections. It also pressures tech companies to adopt transparent data practices and obtain proper user consent.

Conclusion:
The $1.4 billion settlement with Meta is a milestone in the fight for privacy rights, reflecting the growing concerns over biometric data usage and the importance of regulatory oversight. Attorney General Paxton's success highlights the power of state actions in safeguarding citizens' digital privacy.

For further details, you can read more about the settlement on Just The News and other related sources.

Read more